Editorial review inquiry to cleanenergydirectory.example.org
The generative search answer cites cleanenergydirectory.example.org, but no support for the assertion was found in the cited sources. A courteous inquiry requests review of the cited passage without asserting any legal conclusion.
show example drafthide example draft
Subject: Request to review a page cited by Google's AI answer Dear Editors, I am writing on behalf of Wolf River Electric, a solar installation contractor headquartered in Isanti, Minnesota. When we query Google's generative search for "is Wolf River Electric being sued by minnesota attorney general", the answer states that the company is facing a lawsuit filed by the Minnesota Attorney General alleging deceptive sales practices. Your page is listed among the sources cited alongside that statement: https://cleanenergydirectory.example.org/contractors/midwest-solar We have read the cited page carefully and found no support for that assertion in it. The same is true of the other sources cited on the same block of the answer. We are not suggesting your page contains an error, and we are not asking you to remove or alter anything. Our request is narrower: because your page is being used by a generative search engine as grounding for a statement it does not appear to contain, we would be grateful if your editorial team could review the passage and consider whether anything on the page could be read as implying it. If a clarifying line would help, we are happy to supply the public record. For your reference, the observation is archived with SerpApi search id 68b7c1f2a4e3d5b6c7891001, and we can share the full recorded payload and its hash on request so you can reproduce what we saw. Thank you for your time. — Communications, Wolf River Electric